Committee Hearing for Concealed Carry Legislation

The House Homeland Security and Public Safety Committee will hear testimony on concealed carry on campus legislation on Wednesday, March 16, 2011.  All four bills in the House, HB 86, HB 698, HB 750, HB 1167,

Concealed Handgun Carry Resolution

TACT has been busy advocating for faculty rights at the Capitol, and now we’re putting our views into writing.  See our new resolution on Concealed Handgun Carry.

TACT vehemently opposes that students should be allowed to carry concealed weapons on college campuses, as our research and reason shows that the effects of such a bill would be disastrous.  This resolution will soon be put before the Legislature and presented to media sources.

Provide your feedback at www.tact.org by taking our new poll, or signing in and commenting on this news item.  We want to hear from you, whether your views are in alignment or opposition.  Stand up and fight for your rights!  Let yourself be heard. 

To make sure our advocacy is continually funded, contribute to the Government Relations Fund, or call TACT at 512-419-9275 today.

Urgent Legislative Updates

Yesterday was a big day for TACT issues in committees.

Senate Higher Education passed SB 67, a bill that would provide paid leave to faculty who are victims of assault.  TACT registered in favor of this legislation.

Senate Finance received a report from the Legislative Budget Board staff about the base bill funding of Optional Retirement Program and Teacher Retirement System.  Budgeted appropriations levels have been dropped to the constitutional minimum of six percent of salary.  TACT expressed opposition to the reduced funding.

TACT Executive Director in Austin American-Statesman

Below is TACT Executive Director Chuck Hempstead’s letter to the editor published in today’s Austin American-Statesman, regarding the article sent to you on January 10.  Please view the letter below, and feel free to contact us with any thoughts.

“Re: Jan. 10 article "Pressure building to boost graduation rates, cut budgets."

Incentive funding for Texas higher education is when then-state Sen. Bill Ratliff rewarded universities for deploying career, tenured professors, rather than less expensive alternatives, in undergraduate classrooms.  Incentive funding is the Legislature providing additional scholarships to students who cannot afford escalating tuition without it.   

Incentive funding is not to create unfunded mandates while carving a larger slice from a diminishing appropriations pie and blindly wishing that if only the faculty worked harder, all other graduation rate variables will recede and we'll find ourselves with more, younger degree-holders.

Will corporate employment recruiters start asking, "How fast did you graduate to make room for someone else?" Or will they stick with, "What do you know that you can contribute?"

Austin American-Statesman Editorial Board Agrees with TACT

Today in the Austin American-Statesman the Editorial Board penned this Editorial that agrees with TACT about the harmful nature of Outcome Based Higher Education standards. They argue that during this time of budget shortfalls for the state that higher education on all levels shouldn’t be forced to make cuts when enrollment rates are surging at more than 12.2% for two-year public schools.

Syndicate content